Why are educators at Garfield High School boycotting the
MAP test?
Quoted from Jesse’s Op-ed in The Seattle Times Why Garfield
teachers boycotted the MAP test
“Seattle’s ninth- and 10th-grade students already take five
state-required standardized tests, with 11th- and 12th-graders taking three.
Seattle Public Schools staff admitted to a Garfield teacher the MAP test is not
valid at the high-school level, because the margin of error is greater than
expected gains.
In addition, teachers are forbidden to see contents of the
MAP test so they can’t prepare students. Teachers who have looked over the
shoulders of students taking the test can tell you that it asks questions
students are not expected by state standards to learn until later grades.
This test especially hurts students receiving extra academic
support — English-language learners and those enrolled in special education.
These are the kids who lose the most each time they waste five hours on the
test. Our computer labs are commandeered for weeks when the MAP is on, so
students working on research projects can’t get near them. The students without
home computers are hurt the most.
-->
How did the teachers at Garfield become unified and agree
to boycott the MAP assessment?
JESSE: It started with one teacher at Garfield wanting to
talk with me as the building union rep. I figured it was just about a normal
everyday union concern. It turned out this teacher had been talking with a few
other teachers questioning the validity of the MAP
test. The teacher wanted to know what would happen if they didn’t administer
the MAP test. We talked about how in order for this to be a more powerful
action we needed a unified effort with a bigger group of teachers. So we first
meet together with all the teachers in the tested areas and had a conversation.
Then we called an all staff meeting where we talked about consequences
such as insubordination and debated the collective action of not administering the MAP
test. The moment that really turned the debate was when one teacher got up and said
that the test would label them as a bad teacher and the students as failures.
The teacher explained that they would rather be known for standing up against
something that they knew was wrong instead of sitting back and being labeled a
failure. Later the staff took a vote and unanimously voted to not administer
the MAP assessment.
The boycott has gotten national attention, how have
Garfield teachers and the overall message kept up the momentum/organizing
efforts?
JESSE: It has taken a huge effort and a lot of coordination
to keep the boycott going. There are basic tasks that have to get done: talking
with the media, parent outreach, website development, other schools outreach,
etc. We started by electing a five person steering committee to make decisions
quickly and bring proposals to the larger group. We created committees around
research, parent outreach, other schools outreach, solidarity, etc. There are
now five schools participating in the boycott Ballard High School, The Center
School, Chief Sealth International High School, Garfield High School and Orca
K-8 School. We have a citywide boycott committee with representatives from
the various schools. They are also broken up into sub committees. One of the
committees is working on putting forward an alternative
assessment proposal using current research. A dozen schools in the area have sent statements of
solidarity. There have been different national days of action and support from
educators and education activists around the nation.
It sounds to me like what has to done to prepare for a
strike.
JESSE: Yes, it is a similar action in the sense that it is a testing strike and we
are refusing our labor. It is slightly different in approach teachers are the
ones self-organizing along with support from our unions.
What has been the role of a group like Social Equality
Educators (SEE) in the boycott?
JESSE: SEE has played a critical role in the boycott. The
main teachers that came together against the MAP test were SEE teachers. The
schools that have joined the boycott all have SEE leaders in their buildings.
They have been instrumental in holding meetings in their buildings, meetings with the
PTAs, and creating resolutions. SEE had a group that was already unified and
had organizing skills that have played out in the boycott.
How do you see the Garfield teachers “Scrap the MAP”
boycott influencing what is happening in education today?
JESSE: What the boycott has raised is just how little
teachers are consulted or actually never consulted about what is happening in our schools. We should be the first
asked about our schools. What types of tests,
interventions, or wrap around services do our students need? The answers should come from the teachers, parents, and students. If
given the opportunity, we as educators have ideas and could put forward a plan
to improve our schools. We are not asked to be a part of the dialogue. Instead billionaires are asked and they put forward plans that are for privatizing
education.
What teachers/union leaders or movements do you view as
influencing public education in a constructive way?
JESSE: We have seen how teachers can push to shape the
conversation. Look at how the Chicago Teachers Union went on strike demanding
better schools for their students. Another group that inspired us here in Seattle are the Tacoma teachers that went on strike. They were even threatened with
an injunction, but continued to stay out on strike until their demands were
meant. We can look to these recent actions demonstrating how to assert our
voices through collective action, and not just be heard, but also shape the
outcomes.
Obviously high stakes testing is one, but what other main
challenges do you see educators facing today? What are some ways educators can
overcome those challenges?
JESSE: The biggest challenge is for educators to find their
voice and use that voice in what is happening in education today. We are the
ones who should be shaping the conversation about what is happening in our
schools. This can happen when we join together to make sure our voice is heard.
We can do this by joining groups like Social Equality Educators, or others
working for social justice in our schools. We should be the leaders in
education. We can be the leaders in education if we use our ability to unite together and make
ourselves heard.
How have you seen students question their educational
experience through the boycott of high stakes tests?
JESSE: Students are also questioning the value of these high stakes assessments. Our
student government and the PTSA voted in support of the boycott. Student groups
in Portland, Oregon and Providence, Rhode Island created their own boycott
against standardized tests. Students in Colorado are walking out this week against high stakes tests. This is just the beginning of a larger push back
against such privatization reforms that come from billionaires and corporate
reformers. The struggle highlights a bigger problem of privatization and a need
for teachers to assert their voice.
Jesse will be in Portland for a panel about high stakes
testing. Saturday, March 16th at 4pm.
Facebook event page:
Other resources about the Seattle MAP Boycott: